3 edition of Amend the Act of June 3, 1884. found in the catalog.
Record is based on bibliographic data in LexisNexis U.S. Serial Set Digital Collection (last viewed Jan. 2007). Reuse except for individual research requires license from LexisNexis Academic & Library SolutionsLexisNexis U.S. Serial Set Digital CollectionElectronic resource. [Bethesda, Md.]: LexisNexis Academic & Library Solutions, 2004. (LexisNexis U.S. Serial Set Digital Collection : no. 2603 H.rp.2201)
|The Physical Object|
|Pagination||xvi, 66 p. :|
|Number of Pages||64|
nodata File Size: 1MB.
3 A spouse shall not without the consent of the other spouse— a alienate, pledge or otherwise burden any furniture or other effects of the common household forming part of the joint estate; b receive any Amend the Act of June 3 due or accruing to that other spouse or the joint estate by way of— i remuneration, earnings, bonus, allowance, royalty, pension or gratuity, by virtue of his profession, trade, business, or services rendered by him; ii damages for loss of income contemplated in subparagraph i ; iii inheritance, legacy, donation, bursary or prize left, bequeathed, made or awarded to the other spouse; iv income derived from the separate property of the other spouse; v dividends or interest on or the proceeds of shares or investments in the name of the other spouse; vi the proceeds of any insurance policy or annuity in favour of the other spouse; c donate to another person any asset of the joint estate or alienate such an asset without value, excluding an asset of which the donation or alienation does not and probably will not unreasonably prejudice the interest of the other spouse in the joint estate, and which is not contrary to the provisions of subsection 2 or paragraph a of this subsection.
" was the triumphant shout of the demonstrators. It was also supposed to protect and defend First Nations people from those who would do violence against their persons, goods or possessions. 2 Acts Amendment Court of Appeal Act 2004 s. Power of court to order division of accrual• Lord Randolph Churchill obliged at once and urged Midlands Tories to organize a huge ticket-only Queen, Country and Lords meeting at Aston Park for 13 October.
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, and except as provided in paragraph 4if the and the Director of National Intelligence intend to implement the authorization of the intentional acquisition ofbefore the first such implementation after the date of enactment of this Act [ Jan.
[S 25 3 ins by s 4 c of Act 3 of 1988. Registration of immovable property in name of married persons. Available online at: 6 Article 27, International Covenant Amend the Act of June 3 Civil and Political rights: In those States in which ethnic, religious or linguistic minorities exist, persons belonging to such 1884.
shall not be denied the right, in community with the other members of their group, to enjoy their own culture, to profess and practise their own religion, or to use their own language. She would lose her status, and with it, she would lose Amend the Act of June 3 benefits, health benefits, the right to live on her reserve, the right to inherit her family property, and even the right to be buried on the reserve with her ancestors.
Legislation stated that a status Indian woman who married a non-Indian man would cease to be an Indian. 11 67 of 1979 21 Nov 1979 11 Feb 1980 see s. The Indian Act is a part of a long history of assimilation policies that intended to terminate the cultural, social, economic, and political distinctiveness of Aboriginal peoples by absorbing them into mainstream Canadian life and values.
The working classes have given proofs that they are deeply desirous to do what is right. No man is all-wise enough to select rightly - it is the people's voice thrust upon us, not elicited by us, that guides us rightly. Judge Alfred Scow describes some of the impacts of the Potlatch Law: This provision of the Indian Act was in place for close to 75 years and what that did was it prevented the passing down of our oral history.
Serial Set Digital Collection : no.
5 In the determination of the assets or part of the assets to be transferred as contemplated in subsection 3 the court shall, apart from any direct or indirect contribution made by the party concerned to the maintenance or increase of the estate of the other party as contemplated in subsection 4 , also take into account— a the existing means and obligations of the parties; b any donation made by one party to the other during the subsistence of the marriage, or which is owing and enforceable in terms of the antenuptial contract concerned; c any order which the court grants under section 9 of this Act or under any other law which affects the patrimonial position of the parties; and d any other factor which should in the opinion of the court be taken into account.
I am afraid that there would emerge from out of the strife a new party like the social democrats of Germany and that the guidance of parties would pass from the hands of wise statesmen into that of extreme and violent men".